Re: CWS paper

> Here are the numbers using the native backend. They show that a lot of the
> weirdness was caused by using C. Now, both is always as good as call with the
> exception of tensor. And both is always as good as either with the exception of
> knuth-bendix and tensor.

I suspect that part of the issue with tensor is just the native backend
struggling with floating point. You'll notice that the native backend is
slower than the C backend on call, cont, and both. I suspect the speedup
in none arises from the absent trampolining costs.

>                    none  call  cont  both
> tensor              5.5   5.2   5.0   5.3 (native)
> tensor              6.0   4.0   4.2   4.2 (C)